Talk:Lamport timestamp

Computer science B‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

[Lam78]L. Lamport: Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System, Communications of the ACM 21(7), pp.558-565, 1978.

)

I've added a new section, Implications: where I tried to explain what a Lamport clock actually means. I did this by reading Lamport's paper, so I hope I didn't make a mistake. Nadalle (talk) 06:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

I didn't like the explanation that stated two events could not have the same timestamp. This supposes a total order on the system in question. I changed this to refelect that a partial order must be maintained and prefixed that by saying two events cannot occur simultaneously on any single entity. Please comment on this explanation if you wish to change it, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.189.48.210 (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2012 (UTC)