Talk:Niuweidao

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Difference engine in topic Not a Niuweidao image
WikiProject iconChina
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force

Not a Niuweidao image

I've checked the image in this article, and it's not the sword it purports to show. The sword shown is a Liu Ye Dao or Liuyedao ('Willow leaf sabre'), a different type of single-edged dao. Though they may have looked similar, there is currently no image of a Niuweidao sword in Wikimedia Commons. How to proceed ? Should the image be moved to the Liuyedao article, just in case ? --ZemplinTemplar (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Have you read the descriptions of the two types of sword? This image doesn't match how a liuyedao is described at all. It has a broad blade that flares outward, like a niuweidao. The image is mistitled, that's all. Actually, I don't think we should be using these amateur illustrations anyway. Since the Metropolitan Museum made a bunch of their imagery public domain recently, I can upload some of those as examplars of each type of sword. --diff (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
The liuyedao article has now been updated with a representative antique example from the Met. I wasn't able to find a good PD image of a niuweidao (the closest I've found was a proto-niuweidao with less distinctive characteristics), so the illustration will have to do. I did however request that the image and its derivatives be renamed to avoid confusion, which has been done. --diff (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)