Talk:Qenna

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jessegalebaker in topic Not Mistake: Qenna and his papyrus.
WikiProject iconAncient Egypt: Egyptian religion Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:
  • Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

  • Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

  • Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

  • Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

  • Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.



Mistake

This article is the result of a mistaken reading of Budge's Book of the Dead which identifies Nehebka as the goddess of revivified matter. Qenna was a male human merchant, not a goddess. -- 71.34.42.234 (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree this article should probably be deleted. The article was only created in the first place because of a mistake. -- 138.192.30.178 (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Not Mistake: Qenna and his papyrus.

I don't think it should be deleted. Problems are:

1. There are many persons named Qenna known to Eyptology. For instance:

A workman at Deir el-Medina, the village housing personnel who prepared tombs in the Valley of the Kings, Qenna son of Prehotep (Davies, 1999, p. 267).

Another Deir el-Medina workman, Qenna the son of Anhurkhawy. This Qenna had a wife named Meretseger and daughters Tanodjemkhaba and Nefertariemheb (Davies, 1999, p. 22).

Davies, Benedict. 1999. Who's Who at Deir el-Medina. Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. Leiden.

2. Is article about Book of Dead of Qenna, or about person?

The Qenna referred to in the article is the one for whom a notable papyrus copy of the Book of the Dead was recovered. It is unclear, and unlikely, this is either of Davies' Qennas. He lived during late Dyn. 18 or early Dyn 19 and is identified as "the Osiris merchant Qenna" (wsjr Swtj qnnA) in his papyrus. The Qenna papyrus, now at Leiden (Rijksmuseum, Leemans T2), included an unusual passage about an afterlife place called "the house of hearts." See van Dijk (1995) for discussion of Qenna's dates and the house of hearts:

Jacobus van Dijk. 1995. "Entering the House of Hearts: An Addition to Chap. 151 in the Book of the Dead of Qenna." In OMRA 75, pp. 7-12. This document is at Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in Leiden, Netherlands. It is catalogued in Worldcat and at the museum website.

3. Get rid of E.A. Wallis Budge as a reference. While pioneering, his work is considered unreliable and has been superseded by better-informed scholarship.Jessegalebaker (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)