Talk:Syntagmatic analysis

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Untitled

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi I did my thesis in structural linguistics. I'll expand this a bit but I will probably need help with terminonology and the specific conceptual aspects.ELABORATE IN WIDE SENSE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.59.3.92 (talk) 16:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Yoda

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I trimmed this out because it's an incomplete idea.

Turning to the grammatically correct sentence, it prevents the text from reading like it was written by Yoda.

Yoda's sentences are no harder to read that the ethnographic shamanism of Carlos Castaneda; Yodaese syntax is nonstandard, but not difficult. — MaxEnt 20:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Add topic