Talk:Taktser Rinpoche

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Tiger Chair in topic other Taktser Rinpoches?
WikiProject iconChina Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBuddhism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTibet Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndiana Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTaktser Rinpoche is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for, and sustain comprehensive coverage of the U.S. state of Indiana and related subjects on Wikipedia.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can do:

other Taktser Rinpoches?

This reads like a summary article about Thubten Jigme Norbu. Is there any information about the other Taktser Rinpoches? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

The Taktsers seem to have been pretty obscure tülkus prior to one of them ending up as the brother of the current Dalai Lama. It's typical that we have little or no information available about Tibetan Buddhist lineages like that. In practice, then, the article on the lineage often ends up combined with the article on the most famous representative (if there is no famous representative of the lineage, then there's usually no source material with which to create an article on the lineage at all). In this case, someone seems to have decided to create a separate article for the lineage, but here our reach exceeds our grasp, since we don't have additional information to put in the lineage article. – Greg Pandatshang (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
See merger proposal--Tiger Chair (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)