Talk:Tattered Cover

WikiProject iconRetailing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Colorado Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado.
To comment about this article, select the New section tab above.
For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Significant indie bookstore, also took on bookstore chains

Worthy of some more work as most booksellers in the country know of this shop, as there was little case law on the issue of bookbuyers' anonymity beforehand. Indeed, as the Court declared:

"Had it not been for the Tattered Cover's steadfast stance, the zealousness of the city would have led to the disclosure of information that we ultimately conclude is constitutionally protected."

--Paulscrawl (talk) 18:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)