Template:Did you know nominations/Stranger Things (Yuck album)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 19:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Stranger Things (Yuck album)

Created by WereWolf (talk). Self-nominated at 06:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment Source has "parent's" too, but are you sure that that is not just poor copyediting and that it is not "parents' "? Edwardx (talk) 10:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Reviewing: Edwardx the first sources has "parents'", so it is obvious the second source has it wrong. I will correct this error and certain other English usage in good faith while reviewing this DYK. Xender Lourdes (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Massive copyright violations. Paragraphs after paragraphs lifted straight out of sources. Unfortunate. Given that the editor has been here for long, this is shocking. Am reporting the article for the violations. Xender Lourdes (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
So not done. Xender Lourdes (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I just ran the Earwig Copyvio Detector myself, and I notice that this link indeed pops up. Considering the Wikipedia article has been here for a month, and the supposed 'actual source' says it was posted only six days ago, it seems likely the copyright violation actually goes the other way round. Or am I missing something, Xender Lourdes?—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 16:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • You don't seem to be missing anything. You have a very valid point. Even the other copyvio percentages are representative of quotes of the group members. Thank you for checking up on this. I will review this again. Xender Lourdes (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Given that Amberrock has a very valid point, I have struck my earlier comment about there being copyright violations. I would withdraw from this DYK review and request a peer review by another editor to allow WereWolf to have a fair DYK review. Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Upon re-review, the earwig bot scan still pops up the Music of Hell source, which at this writing is dated "one week ago," hence almost three weeks after the creation of this article, making the liklihood that it's a mirror very probable. I see no problems, and I'm fixing the doggone apostrophe in the hook myself, as there is nothing in the source to indicate that he had only one parent living in the house, and the implication is both lived there, so the plural possessive is grammatically correct... if anyone has an issue with that, they can review my review of the review...  ;-) This article has been here languishing over a month. GTG. Montanabw(talk) 19:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)