Template talk:Oldffdfull

The instructions for closing discussions had said to substitute this template. I've merged those instructions to WP:DELPRO#IFD and note that none of the others do, so I'm changing it for now to indicate transclusion.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 21:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I think that those instructions hadn't been updated in a while. I remember some time ago that because images can't be moved, the template didn't require substitution. howcheng {chat} 23:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The present version still refers discussions to a non-existing page Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/(date) instead of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/(date).—pivovarov (talk) 21:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I've updated this yesterday and it seems to work well - see new and old links. Both end you up at the correct section for Ifd/FfD. Purging the cache on an image page may be required if the change is still in the job queue - Peripitus (Talk) 02:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I saw that the Oldffdfull was missing from File:PRINCESS_YASMIN_AGA_KHAN.jpg which had an iFD in May 2007. Oldffdfull generated a close to correct link for the discussion.

• Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 10#File:PRINCESS YASMIN AGA KHAN.jpg Link generated
• Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 10#Image:PRINCESS YASMIN AGA KHAN.jpg Desired link

I tried to override the link using |page=Image:PRINCESS_YASMIN_AGA_KHAN.jpg but the generated link had ...#File:Image:PRINCESS_YASMIN_AGA_KHAN.jpg. I'm not concerned about the link for this specific file but am concerned that xFD links for many discussions may be broken. --Marc Kupper|talk 01:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

}} --TheSophera (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Actually this is a slightly different issue, sorry! I'll post it in its own section. --TheSophera (talk) 00:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Can this template be modified to link to the anchor of the actual discussion? That is:

Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_November_8#File:Cupid.27s_Span.jpg

instead of

Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_November_8

These deletion discussion pages are getting, as Paris says, "huuuuge." Oh. I see, the "page =" parameter has to be deleted to force the anchor link to be generated. --Lexein (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I've already asked about this before at Wikipedia talk:Files for discussion/Archive 8#Re-nominations of the same file. but never got a response before it was archived; so, I figured I'd ask here. Can a template be created for files which is similar to {{afdx}}? The reason I'm bringing this up again is because I recently came across another file which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 December 31#File:Venera9.png and it might be helpful in such cases to know whether a file has been previously discussed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

--TheSophera (talk) 00:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

I apologise. It seems I've posted this on Wikipedia rather than Commons, where I intended to talk about it, but where the issue is already being discussed anyway. Please feel free to ignore this, and I apologise for leaving a mess here. --TheSophera (talk) 00:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)