81.109.92.81

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Channel 5 (UK), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  '''/span (ctrl-click)">[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, why is there a strong scent of User:82.5.224.162 coming from you. Basically Im going to assume you are the same person as your recent edits to the Grimsby Town page included some of the same waffle you had tried to force on to the article a few months ago, and I see that you delete warnings from other editor's on your talk page like your previous self did. I have undone your revisions on the page simply for the fact that some of your infomation you included was false and some of your sentence's made no sense and were poorly constructed. Changing the name of the Non-League section to "Lower basement division" ? and how did you come to the conclusion that Woods was preparing for lower basement games is better than preparing for Non-League games? Very strange! Also Doncaster Rovers are not a direct rival of the club and certainly not worth mentioning ahead of the likes of Scunthorpe, Hull and Lincoln, I am not even going to get started on your old statement in the 1980-1987 section refering that Grimsby never returned to the second tier of English football....when they did twice. I will warn you if you revert to vandalizing the page by trying to force your material on to this article you will end up being blocked from editing like you were before. Please take this as a friendly but stern warning. Thanks Footballgy (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I have also reverted the edits you made to the Cheltenham Town page, I do not understand what ever comes across you to make you put the most bizarre things, but Grimsby Town are in no way rivals of Cheltenham. Grimsby losing in the Play-Off final in 2006 is the only really notable game of any major importance between the two clubs and even so not even that warrants them to be classed as rivals. Feel free to contribute in a constructive way in the future but please stop with the thoughtless edits. Footballgy (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Neither are Accrington Stanley..if you continue with the silly edits you will be reported for vandalism. Footballgy (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grimsby Town F.C., you may be blocked from editing. This is getting kind of old and tideous now my friend, so one last time I am going to spell this out for you in plain and simple English. I've noticed you've tried to slightly alter your usual waffle to try and make it eligible to stay in the article but it really dosen't change the fact that every contribution you have made has dumbed down the article in one way or another. So here goes...

1: Like stated before you said Grimsby Town never returned to the second tier of English football when in fact they did twice. It seems you have now finally realised this..however you are still dumbing down the article and I can see no relevance in putting in the statement "and have never returned to this level until 1991". It makes no real sense, and dosen't improve the article, nor is it really relevant as Grimsby did return twice and the following seasons are covered in the next sub section where it explains that the club earned promotions.

2:In reference to Grimsby's 1992-1993 season the statement "They dipped to 16th place a year later, though they were never in any real danger of relegation" was changed by you to include an irrelevant statement "since the previous decade". What happened to Grimsby in the previous decade dosen't matter as the sentence was refering to there progress during that single season..and not a statement representing the clubs progress over a number of years. This is the kind of thoughtless waffle that is the main reason behind why all of your contributions on this page end up being reverted.

3:The change of the sub section "Financial crisis and relegation (2003-2005)" to "Financial crisis and Hard hit relegation (2003-2005)",....why? You have a strange obsession with stating that relegation hit Grimsby hard..or slapped them dangerously hard..I certainly do not understand why you seem to add a sentence on the end stating this or change the title of sub sections to always include "hard hit" or "hit them hard". This is an example of dumbing down an article. Then there is changing the "Demise and further relegation" section to "Demise and further Hard hit relegation". What is your obsession with "Hard hit"?

4:You altered another sentence in the "Demise and further relegation" section which originally said "However, they were defeated 3-0 by Burton Albion, and thus were relegated from the Football League for the first time in nearly 100 years."..and you changed it to "However, they were defeated 3-0 by Burton Albion, and since 2005 were relegated from the Football League for the first time in nearly 100 years." This also makes no sense what so ever..what has 2005 got to do with Grimsby being relegated from the Football League? Like stated in that sentence...Grimsby had been a Football League club for 100 years and this was the first time they had been relegated from the Football League. So I do not even understand what you meant by that..but anyhow whatever you were getting at it was incorrect..as Grimsby were playing in the Football League for 95 years before 2005..and 5 years after 2005. You then changed that the club were relegated from the Football League for the first time since before World War One..well thats kind of obvious as it states in the sentence "100 years" so I don't see the relevance of saying before World War One when the number of years is mentioned...another pointless and thoughtless edit.

5:This is bar far the most odd edit you have made is in the "Rivals and local games" section. The sentence states that Scunthorpe United are the closest team to Grimsby which is a fact...look it up, check Google Maps if you must. You then initially changed that Doncaster Rovers were...when if you want to go by geography there are four or more professional football clubs who are closer to Grimsby than Doncaster is. You then said that Boston United have since eclipsed Grimsby!!??? Boston United have spent the last four seasons playing in the Conference North and Northern Premier League Division's and have never been in a league above or eclipsed Grimsby in any way..so I honestly do not know what came across you to right something so ridiculous. You then edited this to say Lincoln City is the closest professional club to Grimsby....no it's not..Scunthorpe are the closest..then Hull...then Lincoln.

It is clear to me that you either are attempting to delibarately dumb down the article and cause disruption by trying to force your incorrect material on to the article as its clear to me you know nothing or very little on the subject of this article..and although you may well mean well..you really then need to listen to me when I tell you that all of your edits include either incorrect false infomation..badly constructed and mispelt sentences or ridiculous tripe. I am affraid I am going to treat you as a vandal and will not tolerate any futher disruption on this article or any other football related article. I have made several other administrator's aware of your actions and if you continue to try to force your material on to Wikipedia and work against other editors you will find you will have your editing privladges taken away from you. This is your last warning..if you continue with these silly edits I will seek that you are blocked from editing. Regards Footballgy (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cheltenham Town F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yet again you added incorrect infomation to this page despite being warned about it.Footballgy (talk) 02:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

It's customary not to delete content/warning templates from your talk page. Cj005257-public (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop disruptivly editing wikipedia and then removing the warning templates from your user talk page. Cj005257-public (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

While your articles on Coach Trip and all its different series are very useful and informative, please make sure you check your spelling, grammar and punctuation before finalising your edits. I have noticed you have difficulties in this area from other edits to football clubs that you have made. If you are not good at spelling/punctuation, please get it checked before putting articles on here as poor spelling and grammar looks very unprofessional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.254.39 (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Once again, you have made some utterly bizarre edits. While what you write is correct and informative, the standard of the grammar is unacceptable and looks like a 5 year-old has written it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.146.180 (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Although this is yet another incorrect edit you have made I am not going to be overly harsh on you and report you for vandalism as I assume this time you may of just got this one wrong. This is of course the edit you made to the 1998–99 Football Conference article where you changed Hayes F.C. to Hayes & Yeading F.C.. Hayes & Yeading were not formed until 2007 and were made up of two dissolved football clubs, one being Hayes F.C. and the other being Yeading F.C.. So I reverted your edit on this article because it was Hayes who took part in the 98/99 Conference season. Regards Footballgy (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

My friend, Please stop pointlessly altering sentences as you did on the Swindon Town and 1993–94 in English football articles. Neither sentence was improvement and on the latter article you simply broadened the simplification of the statement. The re-election system was scrapped in 1978..so I see no point in changing it to say it was scrapped in the "1978-1979 season". Your statement on the Swindon page that "they never returned to this level" (which is what you were trying to force on to the Grimsby Town article) in this case is correct, however just adding it on to the end of a completed sentence looks shoddy and thoughtless. I welcome you to make constructive edits, but if I am honest there is not a single edit on a football article I have seen from you that hasn't required deletion whether it be because of bad grammar, spelling, sentence construction, bizarre choice of words or incorrect infomation. Please have a little thought on how you can improve articles both gramatically and truthfully. Regards Footballgy (talk) 09:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 1999–2000 Football Conference has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dreadstar ☥ 15:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 30 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 15:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I see you have been blocked for 30 days for yet again making another thoughtless and pointless edit. It has been made clear to me that your not on Wikipedia to vandalise it and cause disruption and that you do enjoy your editing privleges, but my friend you have well and truly shot yourself in the foot and only have yourself to blame for your recent block. Why on earth do you persist in making these odd and pointless alterations? You know they are going to be reverted and that I, an administrator or another page editor are going to end up sending you a talk page message like this. I hope one day you will listen to what I am telling you and cease with the silly edits. You have been blocked for persisting in dumbing down articles....in this case by adding a pointless mispelt statement on a league table? You only have yourself to blame my friend. Regards Footballgy (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Please Archive your talk page rather than just blanking out sections. Illinois2011 (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

My friend you are utterly relentless I give you that, however please do not edit pages you clearly know nothing about as I see once again you have vandalized the Grimsby Town page for the tenth time maybe?...and all this despite numerous warnings. I'd love to get inside your head for ten minutes and figure out what possesses you to write such tripe. All I can see is that your trying to force your own nonsensical sentences into the article whether they fit in or not. To clarify some of your latest edits they make no sense what so ever, they are just either random snippets of incorrect infomation..or pointless infomation that is irrelevant to the existing sentence or statement. This my friend is dumbing down an article..and is a form of vandalism..hence this will get you blocked again. The one thing I see in your edits that makes me realise above anything else that you clearly no nothing about Grimsby Town, is when you edited a sentence about the 2006 League Two Play-Off final to say Alan Buckley was the manager...I am affraid to tell you..Russell Slade was the manager like previously stated before you edited it. Buckley wasn't appointed until November 2006 (in the 06/07 season)..where as the 2006 Play-Offs took part in May 2006 (05/06 season).

You leave me no choice but to report you to a higher editor as I have lost count to how many times I have reverted your edits, warned you about the standard of your writing and the fact that the majority of your contributions are incorrect. Please stop disrupting football pages as its clear you know very little about them. Footballgy (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

I see you made another pointless edition at the 2006 Football League Two play-off Final, please stop. Footballgy (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

My God, the more I trawl through your contributions the more nonsense I uncover..more silly and pointless word alterations like on the 1991–92 in English football page..changing "expunged" to "expelled" and changing "relegation drop zone" to "slip zone" ?? Since when has it been known as a slip zone? Thats one term I've never heard of. Dare I look any further?Footballgy (talk) 15:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Divided (game show), you may be blocked from editing. . I may not know anything about this subject, but when two or more editors have reverted your contributions saying you need to provide a source for your claim, but still you persist in adding your info and ignoring there request, I am affraid I am going to note this as vandalism and will seek you be blocked from editing for disruptive editing on numerous pages. Footballgy (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been making what seem to be random changes in article wording, for no purpose. Except for removing warnings left for you, you never participate on talk pages. This edit adding unsourced information about a third series of the TV show seems to be deliberate addition of nonsense. 'Ongoing but cancelled' is a contradiction. EdJohnston (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop trolling articles!

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding persistent vandalism, disruption and dumbing down of numerous articles under different IP accounts. The thread is Serial IP Vandal.The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you.