User talk:Njavallil/Archive 3

Valedictorian

look at my edit comment and then say again it was vandalism.87.152.187.231 (talk) 00:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Chocolate

I the content because it had very obviously been copied verbatim from an external source. It was full of opinions ("delicious", "chock-a-block with hilarity", "laugh-a-minute"), and those opinions used the vocabulary structure of a cinema reviewer. As well, the comment that "their next film will also have Prithviraj" uses the future tense, indicating that the comment was originally written before "their next film" was produced -- most likely in 2007 (and in any case, such a comment is not even relevant to this article, indicating that it was originally written to be published elsewhere).

The original text was the intellectual property of either the original cinema reviewer, or of the publication which paid the cinema reviewer. At most, you could say "<X Cinema Reviewer> said that the movie was 'delicious' and 'laugh-a-minute'", or something like that.DS (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

You commented that the information in question was likely "a vandalism added by some Prithviraj fan". This does not fit the definition of "vandalism" as we understand it on Wikipedia -- actual vandalism would be to add meaningless keyboard-pounding garbage, or swear words, or to add a comment about someone being stupid and ugly, etc. Graffiti. How do you define "vandalism"?DS (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


HELP

Hello! Can you please help me block this user who is consistently messing up Bigg Boss articles. I see that you've already warned him on his user talk page against vandalism, that's why i need your help. Actually i don't know how to block users otherwise i would have done it myself. Thanks you! i hope you'll take action against him soon! --Heyhello1234567 (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done Now, what? (only joking!!!)--Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 19:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
LOL! Thanks! :-p --Heyhello1234567 (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Matt Toeaina

You really need to read a bit more carefully before hitting that revert button and warning "vandals"... especially a Level 4 warning? Really? Even if you made a mistake, at best that deserved a Level 1 (e.g. {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}). I appreciate your efforts, but please be more careful in the future.216.163.255.1 (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Njavallil/mypolicy

This is not vandalism. [1]. Also it's a shared Ip so no reason to jump to level 4 in any case. Nobody has been talking to you in a harsh way. You're trying to help but so does the Ip editor. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

You have mistaken me.

I have never mentioned that the edit was vandalism. All I gave the warning for is Page Blanking. --[[User:|Njavallil]] ...Talk 2 Me 21:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Well you reported them to the 'Vandalism' board with "On Matt Toeaina: vandalism after final warning." and also drafted above a 'policy' mentioning vandalism. Illegitimate page blanking would be vandalism, this was not illegitimate, so it wasn't vandalism. That's an information for you not an interpretation of what exactly you said. You have mistaken the IP's intent or the idea of the warning. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
This is leading to Violation of my Policy.--Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 21:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Rollback

This is just silly. You are aware this is an enyclopedia and that user rights are given so that people can aid in the maintenance of it I presume? Leaving because you don't get those rights are like leaving the voluntary work at a charity shop because you weren't allowed the code for the burglar alarm on your second day. Pedro :  Chat  21:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Valedictorian

look at my edit comment and then say again it was vandalism. 87.152.187.231 (talk) 00:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

still nothing to say? still just shouting "vandalism"? 87.152.182.151 (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Daggett, Indiana

Hello Njavallil. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Daggett, Indiana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to towns or places. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)