Nwwaew

To leave me a message, start a new section with ==section title== at the top and place your message below it or click the "New Section" tab to the right of "Edit this Page". Also, please remember to sign your message with ~~~~ at the end, to avoid being harassed by SineBot. Thanks!

If you wish to email me, click here to send me one.

If you are looking for a message from the past, all messages are moved to an archive page (see the section below) when my talk page gets overloaded.

If you are contacting me regarding one of your edits that I reverted, please see this page before you contact me.

Please do not revert personal attacks against me or other editors. If someone decides to be a dick on my page, I'm going to showcase it.

Current Archive:
Archive 5

Past Archives:
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of March 19, 2008 anti-war protest. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Myheartinchile (talk) 18:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

No I will NOT email you. I object to having defend myself against a witchhunt. So NO I will not. Ban me, whatever, but I'm not playing that game. --Killerofcruft (talk) 19:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

You don't understand the subject and you don't undertsand Wikipedia. You seem to think that people should just leave a bad situation alone. Rather than reverting other people's work, you should be trying to improve on what they did. ---The situation with these articles is horrible, I made an attempt to improve what was there. I have nothing to apologize for. You on the other hand, have just reinstituted a crappy situation that itself had no consensus. Good job! I bet you're proud of what you did.P22575R15 (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I stand by my words. I am at least as civil as you, if not more so. Please do not make gratuitous allegations instead of engaging the material. You are forcing the inadequate prior situation on people. Take your own advice : Nobody owns an article. ---What is there in this discussion which would show you as a positive contributor to the problems with the articles? Anything?P22575R15 (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

"And if the situation is inadequate, start a discussion. What may seem "inadequate" to you may be acceptable per Wikipedia standards. "Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 17:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Again, you have contributed nothing positive to the discussion. You are apparently unaware that there was a discussion prior to any changes I made :Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Fraternity.2C_Sorority.2C_and_the_whole_deal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fraternities_and_Sororities P22575R15 (talk) 01:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making hostile comments without taking time to become familiar with the situation.P22575R15 (talk) 22:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

"I see no discussion on the page in question that you linked me to. And where did I make hostile comments? Link me. Additionally, I've read up on the situation, so yes, I know what's going on, before you dispute that. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)"

There are two pages. If you don't see the same discussions about the organization of the topic of the fraternity, I don't know what to tell you, I can't read pages for you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fraternities_and_Sororities#History, history of the system

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Fraternity, Sorority, and the whole deal

You can't have "read up on the situation" if you haven't read these discussions, so that seems an odd claim to make. Apparently editor Corsulian has been working on this and has a sandbox page. A second sandbox page is by editor Abtract.

Hostile comments? Twice you said I was moving pages that "nobody wanted me to", as if I was the problem. (It seems on the other hand it's just that you've been out of touch.) You then apparently "brought me up" on the administrators noteboard, as if I was being "brought up" on charges. Who escalated this to being an administrators' matter? And twice you suggested that I was some sort of problem editor because this "happened before" when, if you checked the dates, you'd see it was the same article changing event. Perhaps it just seemed old to you because you had been out of touch.

So, you're all read up on a topic without knowing where half the recent discussion is, and you know that no one wanted things moved, but you never saw where the discussion was about moving things. Brilliant. You're batting a thousand. You have never offered any constructive point about how to address any issues, so please stop posting in my talk page, you're just continuing an argument for its own sake. If you ever have anything to say about the future, please do. If you want to rehash the past, please leave me out of it.P22575R15 (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Your attempt to threaten a block on my talk page seems misplaced. In the first place, there is no ongoing behavior. For example, my comment, "Bite me" was in response to The Fat Man Who Never Came Back, who appears to have taken the comment in the spirit in which it was intended. My interchange on the talk page of User talk:Natalya seems to be generally resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. I do knot know why you are trolling through my posts, looking for conflicts that do not exist, and posting thing on my post page that are unwarranted.P22575R15 (talk) 16:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You've given him a warning but he's not stopping. See page history hereThe Thunderer (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks. As you seemed to be active against this editor I reckoned the best thing to do was to let you know. Thanks for your intervention too. I've reverted all his attempts to vandalise User:GiollaUidir's page. The Thunderer (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I think my email should work now. Seems I never replied to the verification message. Go ahead and try it. Ebonyskye (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow! You know a lot of templates. Can you teach me some? Irunongames • play 23:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 00:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Volume 5, Issue 7

Weekly Delivery

2009-02-16

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Unsubscribe · Single-page · Full edition »

  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Need your help saving this, now, thanks. -74.242.254.148 (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)