PrfktTear
|
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Optimash prime) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. LittleOldMe 15:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies. I checked the Hasbro site and Optimash Prime is real. Sorry for jumping to conclusions. Regards LittleOldMe 15:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Optimash Prime for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Optimash Prime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimash Prime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 00:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Request to have Block on Account Lifted
PrfktTear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am submitting a request to have the block on my account lifted. I believe I have been mistaken as a compromised or sock account. When creating my profile I borrowed the format/source from user ToddC4176, whose format I liked, adding my own biographical details it to make it my own. My name is Chris and I am not Todd C. It is quite possible that I may have inadvertently failed amend or delete specific information which was unique to ToddC4176, however I assure you this was unintentional and that my only desire was to create a unique profile for myself. Unfortunately I was unaware the validity of my account was not being called into question. I assure you I am neither an imposter nor a sock. I am me! I have never edited maliciously or disruptively. In the future I will be more careful with what I copy and paste! Thank you for your time and attention. -Chris
Accept reason:
You say "It is quite possible that I may have inadvertently failed amend or delete specific information". I can assure you that there was a huge amount of content that you didn't change, which at the time you must have been aware of, even if you have forgotten now. Since this meant that you made dozens of false claims about yourself, your user page was highly dubious. However, it was a long time ago, the user page has been deleted, and there does not seem to be any other reason for blocking you, so I am willing to give you another chance. Welcome back. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!