User talk:TTN/Archive 1

Thanks for uploading Image:Robirdo.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I think this was discussed back on the Thursday the manga was released. I'll have to dig through the history page for a bit to find it. Darkwarriorblade's comment was "latest manga had them say that the demon-host was the last which should imply that only Naruto remains. I can't think what else she could be the last of." when he changed it to a definitive "they have seven Biju in their possession" or something similar. Then an anonymous user responded with "we know for a fact that she's not the last jinchuuriki, as Naruto still remains and he would have said "second last" or some such. so she's the last of something else." when reverting it. Then Darkwarriorblade's next comment is "compromise?" and changes it to "at least three Biju". Then... someone else must have added that other edit. So, I dunno, that whole scene is pretty ambiguous. Geg 17:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

You've got the right idea about this, TTN. Thanks for ending the dispute. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 18:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Here is something I wanna share with you. http://pokefreak.deviantart.com/journal/9498873/--Verde830 23:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Wiki-star: Please do not reply or send any responses to the talk page until the Debate if fully in check. You are ruining it for me, because i can't save the page when you come in and change it! Thanks. Wiki-star 23:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello, you are invited to take part in a straw poll at the Majin Buu page to avoid another revert war with User:Wiki-star. --Orion Minor 23:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Wiki-star claims that you have made a deal with him to use his custom polling system instead of the standard form. Can you confirm or deny your support in the discussion page? --Orion Minor 00:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Snurk, snurk, snurk...

After doing a file report on WP:ANI that was lightly brushed away, administrators suggested taking the case to WP:ARB. The theory being, if User:Wiki-star is as bad as all out, he would shoot himslef in the foot (though he should be lookin' somethin' like the Black Knight by now). As a periphery, I don't feel it's right to act as a cornerstone. Would you organize it?

I'm posting this to several parties involved in this 'lil get-together at Majin Buu, so let them know if you get to it first or decline please. This looks to be our final measure. Papacha 06:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, very much so. Excellent job.

I hope you don't mind if I ask how I'm doing cutting it down and simplifying so far. 'Cause I just did. *grin* Voice of Treason 20:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, well you just might find... you get what you need. Papacha 05:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Well isn't that always true, my good friend... You know, kinda makes you wonder if he'd really clean up his act this time around... ... ... NAH... --3bulletproof16 06:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

However... I am going to miss his dramatic way of writing... that Final Atonement speech almost (ahem... ALMOST) brought a tear to my eye. Well not really, but still pretty dramatic. --3bulletproof16 06:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Well for once I'm somewhat flattered that he actually addressed me this time. Though I'm not too fond of him saying that he was going to kill me, I do, however, manage to find some comedic relief in all this at the thought of him attempting to kill me. Here's my analysis: He can't write at all so my guess is another Dragon Emperor "Sockpuppet". However, the IPs responsible for the recent vandalism are AOL trolls so there is a slim possibility that Wiki-star could indeed be making himself look like an ass again... --3bulletproof16 21:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I can't revert again without being in violation of the three revert rule myself, so you or another will have to change it back. Sorry I can't be of more help. Voice of Treason 01:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Wish that article would be approved for some kind of protection from anonymous users. It's always trouble. Voice of Treason 13:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

And the worst part is, even if he so happens to be right on these future new additions, there's never any dialogue given. It's just to be taken as is, no questions asked, no links provided. Voice of Treason 14:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I looked it over, and there really isn't anything that can be cut. The article likley won't pass for a GA, but the most important character in the series has a good chance, we should focus on that article a little more. I was never really involved with that article anyway except for the time when Wiki-star got involved, and a major clean up was initiated. --KojiDude (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the three-revert rule on Naruto Uzumaki. Kirill Lokshin 15:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Um, why? That was vandalism, not real content. Nemu 15:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't look like vandalism to me (please note that vandalism specifically excludes additions which may be inaccurate, but which are made in good faith). The other participants of this revert war are also blocked now. When you come back, please don't just keep running up reverts, regardless of whether you agree with the changes; if someone keeps inserting material after being reverted, report them and let the admins deal with it instead. :-) Kirill Lokshin 15:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Those were not made in good faith. He knows that it's purly false information. And I'm sure he'll keep adding it after the block. That's one of the downsides of the site. It takes months to ban a simpal vandal. Nemu 15:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Not at all; if he keeps reverting after his block expires, he'll get a rather longer block next time. But, again, please don't just revert-war with him. Kirill Lokshin 16:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 06:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete the "test 1" message I just left on that IP user's talk page? Kukini 22:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I was looking at when he blanked the page and forgot to refresh it. Nemu 22:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

OK...I reverted it. Your post is still there. Kukini 22:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

A belated thank you for merging Motherload's content into MotherLoad-- this was a somewhat involved text merge, so thanks for taking care of it! Dar-Ape 21:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't personally think that a few minor scratches would matter :) Cobalt 21:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't really classify the fact that Eiichiro Oda said Zoro "most resembled a shark" as "pointless information". Also, merging the trivia into the article is completely pointless and results in a more scattered and messy section. Trivia is what it is, and it's really not up to you to decide what's "better" or more "useful". The actual definition of "trivia" is "insignificant or inessential matters; trifles". It's just a small section where random bits of information about the character belong. Please stop this mad-scientist plastic surgery on all of the One Piece pages.

Thank you.

Treecake88 23:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)treecake88

I missed that, big deal. Random bits of pointless information don't belong in an article. I don't see that anyone else minds my placement of the trivia. If they do, they can remove it or place it in the correct part of the article. But in the end, the non-mreged information is pointless. Nemu 23:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate the fact that you are enforcing the Image use Policy, but right now is not the time to do so on the Kiwi article. Trust me you have to understand that removing everything at once angers trolls and only makes matters worse. Everything has to be done slowly. Trust me. The images will be removed shortly but now is not the time. Wait until User:Zarbon calms down a bit. Hope you understand. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Oops, didn't read this in time. Oh well, if he can't see the last edit I made is much better, he's too crazy to keep dealing with anyways. Nemu 03:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I guess he is crazy. He really doesn't know how to make a page look decent. Nemu 03:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

"he's too crazy to keep dealing with anyways."

You're just now realizing that...?--KojiDude ^{(viva la BAM!)} 03:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I assumed he was a little too obsessive with "his" pages, not this absurd. Nemu 03:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Tell me about it. He even admitted on his own talk page to have an WP:OWN issue with the Kiwi (Dragon Ball), Dodoria, Zarbon articles. Remind you of anyone? I'll give you a hint- W_k_-s__r. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Damn, that could be anybody...--KojiDude ^{(viva la BAM!)} 03:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Tough one, ain't it? -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

So, is he anywhere near realizing that it isn't his article, so it can be reverted? Nemu 04:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope, but I tried (see his talk page). At least he seems to have cooled down for now. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I wanna remove the (anime only) written on the techniques that the Naruto characters have used. Answer back to me for your opinion. User:Kabuto Yakushi

Hi, I'd be happy to do something similar for you. It may take me a few days to get to it though. You might also like to request an editor review instead or as well. Best, Gwernol 19:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Is that the highest quality pic we're going to get? I was planning on waiting until we had a decently cleaned copy of the chapter and then uploading it. --tjstrf 02:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

No clue. The person had said high quality, but it seems more like medium. A better version can replace that one when it comes it. Nemu 02:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

OK. I'm hoping for a decent colour spread of them at some point, myself. --tjstrf 02:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)