User talk:TTN/Archive 18

You know I usually agree with you, but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cylon (Battlestar Galactica), errr. I'd recommend a withdraw, plus starting a merge discussions. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Eh, the article was sparse and the initial search results were the usual brief mentions, so it happens. Seems fine to just let it run its course at this point. TTN (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Not a new user who clearly has it in for you: User_talk:Darkknight2149#TTN. I don't know who it may be, since they seem to be like someone from your past, not mine. Maybe User:Reyk may have an idea, since he commented about that account connection to User:A Nobody, but I have never interacted with that. Still, if there are concerns like this, SPI may be worth considering. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:14, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, that was the 131 IP. Clearly A Nobody editing as an IP from one of his usual haunts. I don't know anything about Miraclepine, if they've had previous accounts, and if so who they were. Reyk _YO! 10:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
• Seems to just be a combative inclusionist. Though given that I have around 14 years on and off, it wouldn't be surprising for someone to hold a long term grudge. There was someone recently who posted a message like "I'm going to automatically oppose anything you do because I think you DONTLIKEIT" or something to that effect. That may or may not have been them. TTN (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Since your current goal is cleaning up fiction fancruft, I would recommend taking at Batman: Dead White, Batman: Inferno, and Batman: Fear Itself at some point (about a trilogy of novels). I found these as stubs years ago and took it upon myself to flesh them out to meet Wikipedia standards. However, as soon as I looked for sources, I came back dead empty. These novels received almost no coverage and are clearly too obscure to have Wikipedia articles. DarkKnight2149 07:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me, but who are you? I would presume that only Administrators or trusted users with special tools to have the right to add the templates you are adding, so may I ask you if you are allowed to dictate whether or not something is useful and if an article is a candidate for deletion or if you think you have the right to start a discussion about whether or not an article should get deleted when perhaps discussion is pointless? I am sorry if I have come off as aggressive, but I am tired of people that think they can do things that they shouldn't do.

You have 24 hours to explain to me why or not you have the right to add that template, and if you don't answer within that time-frame (I may be lenient) then I will remove that template because frankly I don't quite trust you. FunnyWick (talk) 02:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, read WP:PROD and WP:AFD. I'd also suggest asking for a WP:MENTOR because you have quite a bit to learn about the site. TTN (talk) 02:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Oh... but I would think it I'd be more logical if someone of high status could only add those templates, but I guess that would be tiresome and would take too long if only well-received users did that. I guess I will stay away from what I don't understand, even though that makes me less helpful... I pretty much only came here to add two articles that I thought should be added to Wikipedia anyway, and I decided to edit a lot while I wait to become an Autoconfirmed User, and I will become one soon and maybe I stop annoying people with my stupidity and start doing something I actually know how to do... I think I do. I am sorry to have bothered you. By the way (this is not an excuse, please don't assume that), I have Aspergers. I am sorry again, I should have remembered to assume good faith. FunnyWick (talk) 02:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!

Hello, TTN! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I reverted your edit to User talk:JarlaxleArtemis. This was a pure housekeeping action as JarlaxleArtemis has been permanently banned from all WikiMedia sites since September 2006. JIP | Talk 10:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

@JIP: I think that page should be fully protected to prevent such mistakes in the future, what do you think? ミラP 03:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

I had to do it again. You are doubtless using some sort of automated script for your countless deletion nominations, and thus User:JarlaxleArtemis was notified again, despite having been permanently banned for over thirteen years. JIP | Talk 00:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, Twinkle just notifies the creator automatically unless you uncheck it. Should that page just be protected? TTN (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes, not doing it doesn’t seem like a good idea, considering JarlaxleArtemis created several DND topics many of dubious notability. After all, this was salted for five years until the WMF Office account created the page and forgot to protect it. @JIP: You have admin powers, so I don’t see why not do it yourself? ミラP 01:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Done. JIP | Talk 02:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@JIP: There's another one you forgot: [1]. ミラP 15:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Reverted edits and protected indefinitely. Thanks for the heads-up. JIP | Talk 20:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

@JIP: You're welcome. I'll just move this to your UTP since it's getting huge. ミラP 00:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

One thing I have been wondering: Why does the list of your talk page archives start with 2, 1 instead of 1, 2 when it has all the archives from 3 onwards in the correct order? Is this by design or just a mistake? JIP | Talk 23:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

It was generated by the ClueBot III archiver I started using. No idea how to fix it, but I also haven't actually looked. TTN (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it makes sense to propose to delete a supertopic for which extant subtopics exist. Since there are numerous articles on kinds of undead in Dungeons & Dragons (e.g., Vampire (Dungeons & Dragons), Skeleton (Dungeons & Dragons), Lich (Dungeons & Dragons)), those at least should be addressed before the supertopic covering them is addressed. BD2412 T 13:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

There's definitely plenty to talk about in terms of D&D's cultural impact, but I'm not sure if that general topic is suitable. But if you want to initiate a merge discussion on those topics, I'm certainly fine holding off on AfDing it. TTN (talk) 14:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Let me work something out over the weekend. BD2412 T 17:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

I have initiated a discussion at Talk:Dungeons & Dragons/Archives/ 9#Proposing a new approach to subtopics. Cheers! BD2412 T 20:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TTN,

I noticed you have changed the redirect targets for several of these autobot related pages. I'm deleting some broken redirect pages that are the result of a recent deletion discussion on the subject of autobots. If you would like any of them restored because they could be changed to redirect to another page, let me know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

A recommendation of mine since you don't like plots and the style of which comic book related articles are done on these comic related articles is to bring a new consensus on style here. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 07:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

I ask that you please not delete the Tatsumi or Psyma family pages for Kyuukyuu Sentai GoGoFive. Using this site for information on them was the only way to get specific andprecise translations, since Power Rangers Fandom doesn't do it. --Youngsevon (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

@Youngsevon: TTN's not an admin and can't delete pages, but rather uses WP:PROD. ミラP 16:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Herostratus (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

TTN, I don't want to wade into ANI, but ping me in the unlikely event it starts going sour for you. I believe your nominations are a net plus, even if I occasionally have to abstain because I like a subject to much to admit it's not notable. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Good to know. I'd be fine to discuss through actual issues, but it seems kind of impossible when we're on completely different pages on how WP:N works. TTN (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Gerrard Capashen should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 25#Gerrard Capashen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

What was the section header that Levivich had for that section? I wanted to rename it with that title, but ran out of time & gave up searching. (Still trying to wrap up a project from yesterday that won't stay fixed.) -- llywrch (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

@Llywrch: I went with the most generic thing I could think of, "User:TTN reported by User:Herostratus" Levivich ^{[dubious – discuss]} 22:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting this article - when l was writing it, l was hamstrung by the fact that Kara's origin story hadn't benn pot online at either Comics Plus or the Digital Comics Museum yet. Only after l was actually able to read it did l learn Baldayo had in fact survived the crash!Glammazon (talk) 13:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Like 15 years later and you're still as much of a blight as you ever were. What a sad and miserable person. I'll be back to remind you of this again when I remember you in another 15 years. - 2601:600:107:53C5:2C0F:531A:B9D5:CA20 (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

It’s really weird how a few people are still perpetually angry that I redirected or AfD’d “obscure episode 47 of a show” or “random secondary character that’s not even important in their own series.” You would have a much greater quality of life by not retaining that anger for so long. I hope you get the help you need. TTN (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

As the original author of this article I agree this should be deleted!--Mark Miller (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Although I did pick up a book source for this recently. So now I have two additional sources to what is there. If that means anything.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps you know of a good diff to add there, the CU have asked for more evidence showing similarity? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

What do you think about [ https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/en/Special:Contributions/Archrogue] this? -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Did you mean to post a different link? That one has a varied series of Keep/Merge/Delete !votes with no sign of rabid anti-deletion sentiment. TTN (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I was more concerned with the pattern of almost entirely AfD activity, I didn't notice they actually made some delete votes. Still, not a new account, hmmm. Also, another new account, a bit different pattern two but maybe you'll notice something I don't: [2]. At Man-at-arms, repeated the sources/vote of the already-banned sock. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TTN. You have new messages at Jax 0677's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jax 0677 (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect .hack character classes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 13#.hack character classes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello TTN! In the recent deletion discussion about Martok you've raised the point that we should better take care for "Properly curated character lists" rather than separate articles in cases where notability is in doubt. Now that the article has been kept, I don't think lists and articles have to be in opposition to each other. Would you like to work together to improve the list entry/ies for Martok, by mining the article? Thanks for letting me know! Daranios (talk) 07:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Something happened... again. My IP address changed again from 147.135.124.3. to 107.146.244.150 to 97.97.69.152. 2603:9008:1704:32FE:C0E6:CCBC:780:F77F (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

I am leaving this message to let you know that the article Rising Sun (character) that you tagged for Proposed Deletion was removed by another user, and they failed to leave a note on your talk page about it. They also appear to not have given any reason for doing so (see the articles edit history). This was a month ago, but it has gone unnoticed. As you were not informed, I have taken it upon myself to leave this here so you may consider perusing Articles for Deletion instead, as adding a new PROD is not permitted. Kind regards, --Tautomers_{(T C)} 08:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giratina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giratina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bryn (talk) (contributions) 00:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A Random Act of SpongeBob. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 20#A Random Act of SpongeBob until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 05:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

And hope you are doing ok! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

I mentioned you at this ArbCom page involving a 14 year old case and I think am required to notify you were mentioned but you are not otherwise involved other than as a historical reference. -- GreenC 06:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

You suggest to shorten that section in the main article, while other TV shows based on TMNT have an article dedicated fully to the almost all of the characters. Haji kiluu (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

WP:OSE. Other articles doing things incorrectly doesn't justify keeping a bad article. Plot elements should correlate to their importance in acting as a summary for context for the article. Most pieces of fiction don't need more than their core characters described. TTN (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Primal Instinct and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#Primal Instinct until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. I did ping you as the BLARer of this (which was 14 years ago!) but I'm putting this notice here for completeness' sake. A7V2 (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)