Terrible towel7

Do not delete my edits on As'ad AbuKhalil, which both properly quote him in an appropriate source (his own blog). His blog is cited multiple times in the article, so clearly you have no issue with citing his blog. You may have an agenda to support AbuKhalil but I do not and I'm quoting him accurately.@Huldra:The only person vandalizing any article is you, Huldra.

@Huldra:Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

December 2015

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at As'ad AbuKhalil. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Given your only edit since the block was imposed, it's worth flagging that any further personal attacks will result in a longer removal of editing privileges. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

AC/DS Alert

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NE Ent 00:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Add topic