Lombshi

Blocked

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

I have blocked this account as an unacceptable username. (For anyone not seeing the problem, read it backwards.) Independent of the username, the pattern of contributions had already caught my attention as a suspicious one. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lombshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The name is in reference to my YouTube channel, I apologize for any disruption it has caused, but I assure you it was an honest mistake. I will be more than happy to be re-named if that is possible. I am also a somewhat prevalent IP editor. TihsReggin (talk) 02:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You need to submit a new username for us to review. Use {{unblock-un}}. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lombshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Lombshi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Generic name, should not cause any trouble. TihsReggin (talk) 04:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Rename completed. You should be able to log in with this username and your existing password. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

This looks fine; despite the highly questionable name, your edits appear good. Rename in progress. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Again?

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lombshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked again? I thought we had worked this out... :/ Lombshi (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This has nothing to do with your username. This has to do with block evasion. It's fairly clear that this account is the sockpuppet of a banned user. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Add topic