Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic 1993

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustic 1993

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bootleg. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N - I am unable to find significant coverage for this bootleg. I considered suggesting merge to Midnight Oil discography but there appears to have been a deliberate decision on that article to not include bootlegs. Note that Acoustic 1993 is also the name of a release by Roxette. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for second relisting: No comments during first relist period. Stifle (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Bootlegs are generally not notable per WP:NALBUM unless they meet WP:GNG. Although a Google search turns up a couple of hits, most of them are torrent sites, album directories, etc. with no significant coverage in reliable sources necessary to satisfy GNG. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 16:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a bootleg, no demonstrated coverage. Did it need to be relisted twice? David V Houston (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.