Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance HE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advance HE

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Sources don't prove its notability. Zinzhanglee (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No current source is independent of the subject. While I have not done a complete search of the internet, most of the results I have seen so far are places where Advance and HE are separated by some punctuation (e.g. He went for dinner after orderinging the advance; he ate chicken while his men died by the thousands). Everything else I am seeing is either press release, vanity press, or passing mention. Rockphed (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Source search doesn't show anything notable. Just because its connected to notable orgs doesn't grant it auto-notability. Clear delete. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 04:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. MER-C 16:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs a few more comments; two deletes, one blocked sockpuppet and one comment on the latter are not enough consensus for anything.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.