Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-war film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. I made a mistake with nominating this article. JDDJS (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-war film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All original research. Anti-war is not an actual genre. JDDJS (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, rename List of anti-war films and clean up (i.e. provide references). There are enough sources out there, e.g. The Thin Red Line described as an "anti-war film", a scholarly article titled "Anti-War War Films", Stephen Spielberg quoted as saying, "every war movie, good or bad, is an antiwar movie", anti-war film festivals[1][2][3] (albeit with obscure sponsors), etc.[4] Clarityfiend (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and rename, per Clarityfiend. Restrict the list to those films that have been described by a reliable source as being "anti-war". Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No need to rename, as an article on a genre need not be titled as a list. Scholarly articles on the subject indicate that yes, notability is there. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.