Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkansas Vibe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ffm 01:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas Vibe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable magazine. Article is written like an advertisement, and there is an obvious conflict of interest with the main contributor. CyberGhostface (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I prodded the article for the reasons above, though my prod was removed, and I still think that it is written as an advertisement, and that the magazine's notability is not clear. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment this listing was not wrote to be an advertisement. Just a "about me" type article. we used many other magazine wiki's as a base for the format of the article is wrote. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_magazine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Us_Magazine please help me to understand the difference. besides ArkansasViBE is newer and not as established. I am more than willing to make changes to make it conform to guidelines if it currently does not. Arkansas Vibe (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Whether or not you meant it to be advertising, writing about yourself or something that you are associated with still constitutes as conflict of interest. And as you yourself stated, "ArkansasViBE is newer and not as established". That's pretty much an indication that it's not notable enough for inclusion here.--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Definitely non-notable, with really unimpressive numbers cited in the article and random trivia (one of the advertisers is a car dealership? so what?) Per the above, there also appear ro be advertising / COI issues here. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: non-notable. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete too new and not many sources to demonstrate Note. We66er (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.