Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independant coverage to make it notable as a standalone article. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While the article should be expanded, the conference is very well known in the electronics industry. It's referred to by independent sources, mostly under the name ASP-DAC. For example, ASP-DAC convenes. There are issues of well known journals that concentrate on the results. It's considered an academic honor to be featured there. Finally, I think this may be case of geographic bias. Most of the attendees and presenters are from Japan, Taiwan, and other Asian regions, not surprisingly. So the conference is better known, and more notable among folks who are not likely to be editors here. LouScheffer (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd agree there is some coverage. Some of it doesn't seem to be completely independant though, which includes reports from award winners institutions potentially. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if some of our Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin speaking editors could check the sources and publications in their languages, since that's where most of the attendees and presenters are from. LouScheffer (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If anyone here knows how, that would be a good idea! -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing about this passes the notability guidelines. The article doesn't have any sources and I was unable to find any when I did a search for them. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look for "ASP-DAC"? It's almost always abbreviated. LouScheffer (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To be honest I think I missed a trick not searching for it abbreviated... -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merging to IEEE Circuits and Systems Society seems ideal, IMO. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.