Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination of Benazir Bhutto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep - WP:SNOW and invalid nomination rationale. Paul Cyr (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination of Benazir Bhutto

Assassination of Benazir Bhutto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

the article is going to continue more mass killings in the Islamic area. Eldorado91 (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep This is a frivolous and extremely ridiculous motion. The article documents a historical event and nothing more.

Canadian Bobby (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep Wikipedia is not censored. --Phirazo 21:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep This is a baseless nomination. Joshdboz (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, obviously Wikipedia's goal is to document the world as-is, rather than trying to change it. --12.215.100.131 (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Rationale doesn't make sense. 203.160.122.75 (talk) 22:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is historical. Keep it here.--RoryReloaded (talk) 22:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. I have asked the user to cite policy, and he has not done so. Another user supporting the AfD is also making legal threats on the article's talk page. SorryGuy  Talk  22:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep I second all the above opinions. Two One Six Five Five (talk) 22:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Why are we even considering this motion? It's patent nonsense 81.129.130.162 (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep This is absurd.Kitchawan (talk) 03:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.