Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azimuth, Delaware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Azimuth, Delaware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, probably non-existent place. This was dePRODded because the name appears in Google Maps, but no other confirmation can be found. Google Maps alone would not be enough to satisfy WP:NGEO, and it is becoming increasingly clear that Google Maps/Earth is not a reliable source, because it accepts and does not check user-generated material. This is one of a series of articles by KhnewKreator (talk) which, stretching the limits of AGF, just may be absolutely non-notable local neighbourhood names, but seem more likely to be hoaxes. For others, see WP:Articles for deletion/Midzemuthleiy, Delaware and WP:Articles for deletion/Maar, North Dakota. JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per other AfDs. Non-verifiable, likely hoax.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just like Midzemuthleiy, it fails WP:V. Insufficient evidence this place is real and no evidence it passes WP:NGEO. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.