Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Mohammad Bhai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aziz Mohammad Bhai

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was created in 2015 describing the living person as an "alleged crime-boss" inter alia. It had a single source at the time, which did not substantiate those allegations. It still has the same single source now, which still does not substantiate those allegations. This is after I removed a number of sources which were not about the subject, some of which did not mention the subject, recently, after a complaint at WP:BLPN. I therefore described the original as an attack page. With or without the removal of the additional sources, there are not enough sources for the subject to pass WP:GNG nor WP:BIO. To maintain proper regard for WP:BLP, this should be deleted. MPS1992 (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MPS1992 (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MPS1992 (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Since I have added references, there are now references in the article. Bangladesh's national media coverage, as seen by article sources and a quick Google search, Indicates the Subject Pass WP:GNG.-Nahal^(T) 10:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep : He has produced over 50 films. otherwise According to Bangladesh's national media coverage WP:GNG pass. --DelwarHossain (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per DelwarHossain, although more citations may make it strong enough to pass wp:gng Shubhi89 (talk) 09:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)— Shubhi89 (talk • contribs) has made Single-purpose account outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Sourcing seems thorough enough, though the entry could use further cleaning up. CmdrGibbons (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)CmdrGibbons[reply]

CmdrGibbons has been indefinitely blocked. MPS1992 (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.