Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakti Ballabh Tirtha Goswami Maharaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - Nabla (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhakti Ballabh Tirtha Goswami Maharaj

Guru advertisemet with no reliable third party sources. Article is an advertisement for a non notable. Also, does not meet the standards of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Guru advertisemet with no reliable third party sources. Article is an advertisement for a non notable. Also, does not meet the standards of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Head of an institution. Name should be changed to Bhakti Ballabh Tirtha to comply with no honorifics policy. Wikidās ॐ Thats all folks from me 19:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Guru advertisemet with no reliable third party sources. Article is an advertisement for a non notable. Also, does not meet the standards of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Thanks.Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable (see WP:NOTE) - head of a relatively small institution, contains little information and few sources to establish notability. There are many small institutions within Hinduism and many leaders of these, many of whom are non-notable for their size and relative contributions to the religion. I think the subject of this article is no exception. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 23:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not sufficiently established. --SJK (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.