Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidding war

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Bid price#Bidding war. Vanamonde (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bidding war (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sourcing, never heard of this until I tried to legitimately link to it as a business/acquisitions term (in fact it used to, but then someone replaced it with this as their only edit). If not deleted, this shouldn't be the primary topic. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Searching for such a game doesn't produce relevant hits, and under the circumstances it's not unreasonable to expect some sourcing for a difficult-to-search topic. Mangoe (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Bid price#Bidding war. No sources found and possibly made up (CSD A11). SpinningSpark 22:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• What Spark said. --Izno (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect Hyperbolick (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect no sources and not on Pagat. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.