Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britain's Independent Scout Organisation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Britain's Independent Scout Organisation
[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Britain's Independent Scout Organisation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article with likely COI (founder = author). I am unable to identify reliable, unaffiliated sources about this organisation. Therefore, propose deletion as it fails GNG and NORG. As a side note, the main body World Organization of Independent Scouts may also warrant to be looked at given it's defective sourcing and likely lack of notability. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as no credible assertion of notability. Doesn't seem particularly appropriate to redirect to World Organization of Independent Scouts if by the nominator's admission, that article includes "defective sourcing". Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no assertion of notability and no sources. It could be a redirect to World Organization of Independent Scouts as I did earlier, but is not clear it even deserves that. I have already edited that article to clarify the UK positision. --Bduke (Discussion) 09:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025