Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carex petasata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carex petasata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references. There for it is not notable. WOLfan112 (talk) 18:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per WP:COMMONOUTCOMES, "All species that have a correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are inherently notable. Their names and at least a brief description must have been published in a reliable academic publication to be recognized as correct or valid." The external links verify that this is a recognized species. (This nomination is the second recent nomination by User:WOLfan112 of verified species, along with the nomination of Polyester}. Edison (talk) 18:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.