Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DATTCO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DATTCO

DATTCO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company lacking non-trivial support. References are not independent, or do not even mention company. Fails WP:ORG. reddogsix (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - The existence of other articles is not relevant to this discussion - See WP:WAX. The quality of the "references" you have added does not support the article inclusion. They are only listings or mentions in schedules. They are trivial in nature. reddogsix (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this may be better notable and improvable later but I'm simply not seeing much better currently including from the listed sources. Draft and userfy if needed, SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Insufficient evidence to suggest that this meets WP:GNG at this time. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.