Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DG Cells

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits#Devil Gundam. Merger at editorial discretion.  Sandstein  21:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DG Cells

DG Cells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional topic does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to the G Gundam article. 70.55.86.100 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect As part of the cleanup of Mobile Fighter G Gundam, I've been trying to figure out exactly what to do with this article. The article does fail WP:NOT#PLOT and I reasonably sure that there is no real-world information that can be added to the article to allow it to pass WP:FICT or WP:NOTE. There is no where particular to merge any of the information either. The question focuses on how likely it is as a search term. The best solution would be to redirect it to List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits#Devil Gundam and add a brief mention of the DG Cells in the list entry's description. --Farix (Talk) 20:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits#Devil Gundam.Kuwabaratheman (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Why was this relisted when there was already a pretty clear consensus to redirect or merge? Just do the redirect already and allow anyone who might be interested to use the edit history to do any more merging. DHowell (talk) 23:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.