Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOGRI CINEMA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination was withdrawn, and no other delete !votes are present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DOGRI CINEMA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. Only sources to facebook, wikipedia and youtube. No indepedent or reliable sources GAtechnical (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User:Ekabhishek has added a number of reliable sources. Looks good. Shyamsunder (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per improvements and additional sourcing. Nominator's concern of the old version being poorly sourced has been addressed through regular editing. The article still needs work, but kudos to User:Ekabhishek for his efforts. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just like to add well done to Ekabhiskek, article is now in a reasonable state. With my cynical hat on; shame it has probably only come about being improved to this standard because I had to nominate for the reasons I gave before hand. But seriously good job. GAtechnical (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe you could in good conscience withdraw your deletion nomination, please say so and we can get this AFD closed. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly can after being asked so nicely. I hereby withdraw the AFD. GAtechnical (talk) 11:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.