Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DbXpert for Oracle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 07:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DbXpert for Oracle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable technology; spam. The Evil Spartan 18:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTABILITY Shruti14 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, notability not suggested. Pavel Vozenilek 20:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per The Evil Spartan. Jakew 21:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SPAM. Also, there is a WP:COI. The developed is the only contributor to the article. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 22:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it I am doing some research on the software tools on the Database marketing. Wikipedia provides a great place for me to search for related tool. I can seach the tool here such Toad (Software), Advanced Query Tool, Sequence profiling tool, etc. I would sugget to keep it. Kekedada (talk • contribs) — Kekedada (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Suggest to Keep, useful to reader. It's an article to provide information about the tools available, not a WP:SPAM- Maahela (talk • contribs) — Maahela (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.