Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Kane's Water Taxi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Kane's Water Taxi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

NN corporation, fails WP:CORP Hipocrite (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Notability fails Rotovia (talk) 00:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Plenty of in-depth coverage available in reliable sources to meet notability per WP:CORP. I added a few of the references from the first page of Google search results including some coverage in books. This company has been providing transportation on the Baltimore Harbor for over 30 years. Drawn Some (talk) 21:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Included in various discussions of water taxis as commuter service, and whether this should be subsidized by taxpayers (added this discussion to the article, with references) LouScheffer (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Enough news coverage listed in the article to meet notability guidelines. Dream Focus 21:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's readable. It's got coverage in decent sources. It's cool. --Firefly322 (talk) 03:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. 16 million passengers over 30 years of history... a sort of floating landmark. Easily passes WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per expansion. Granite thump (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.