Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Nights at Freddy's: The Twisted Ones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Five Nights at Freddy's. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five Nights at Freddy's: The Twisted Ones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was actually rejected when it was in draftspace and consists almost entirely of an in-universe plot description. It really doesn't look like it meets the GNG. It's only got four references, and I couldn't find any professional reviews. It's probably best covered in a paragraph at the main Five Nights at Freddy's page. ~ TheJoebro64 (talk) 20:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TheJoebro64 (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to series article. I can't find any reviews in reliable sources (which should have happened, given confirmation the book was out in June). The book is a potential search term, so it should be merged and redirected. --MASEM (t) 20:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to series article, where the only hint of notability exists. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Seems like there's a few details to verify some brief details about it, and a series article to host it, but not enough to meet the WP:GNG. As the article writer even stated, there's no book reviews or sales figures available. Not a good sign for notability then. Sergecross73 msg me 21:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - It is unreliably sourced, and it was taken from the original draft (I was the owner of the draft, but some user took the content). It must be merged with the Five Nights at Freddy's page. Plus, articles such as this one must have a "Reception" section in order to be move out of draft space, but since no critics have reviewed the novel The Twisted Ones, it is not eligible to be an article. Cosecant57 (talk) 17:20, 2017-09-20 (UTC)
Comment: If the consensus is ultimately to merge, the non-free use of the infobox image should be reassessed to see if the new way in which the file will be used still complies with WP:NFCCP. Non-free cover art is generally considered NFCCP compliant when it is being used as the primary means of identification in the main infobox or at the top of a stand-alone article about the work in question, but (as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3) requires a different (perhaps stronger) justification for non-free use when used in other articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a pretty normal step in the merge process. --Izno (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.