Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freight Train (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SK#1 j⚛e decker ^talk 05:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Freight Train (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one "Open Library" ref. Waiting with a "sources" tag since 7 and a half years and no development in that sense. Not notable book. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A classic picture book for little kids, won a Caldecott Honor [1], has been the subject of noteworthy spinoffs [2][3] and continues to be acknowledged as an important book of the genre.[4][5][6] --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Caldecott Honor is one of those rare awards that would be enough to keep on that basis alone and Arxiloxos found more sources to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the nomination. Thanks for the refs found and added. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 04:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.