Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haber (Spanish verb)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Peacent 02:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haber (Spanish verb) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Falls under WP:NOT, per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. KJS77 23:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, since Wikipedia also isn't a language-learning site. Nyttend 23:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Suprimir, Wikipedia no es un diccionario de español/inglés. (Delete, Wikipedia is not a Spanish/English dictionary). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not only dictionary content, but Spanish dictionary content. -- Jimmi Hugh 23:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per all, and this should probably have been prodded rather than brought up for AfD, as it's surely going to snow. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 00:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and everyone else. Maxamegalon2000 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this is adequately covered in wikt:haber#Spanish. John Vandenberg 05:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.