Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highway Spartans Cricket Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Highway Spartans Cricket Club

Highway Spartans Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local cricket club, and only 84 Google hits for "Highway Spartans Cricket Club". Currently unreferenced, and I can't find independent reliable sources that discuss it in detail. Slashme (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Doesn't pass WP:AUD. No significant coverage other than local nor with secondary sources. Ajf773 (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Just seems to be a local club without any notability. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is only a local club. DilMendis82 (talk) 15:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable club. The original article at Highway Cricket Club strikes me as equally non-notable and also contains nothing but trivia. Johnlp (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.