Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigration Rules

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Will someone do so? Bearian (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration Rules

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating three articles relating to the immigration and customs and the United Kingdom. They are Entry clearance, Administrative removal, and Immigration Rules. These articles are WP:Original research, WP:Neologisms, lacking WP:Reliable Sources, and/or not WP:Notable. They should all be merged into an appropriate article such as an article on the custom's of the United Kingdom or the Immigration Policy of the United Kingdom. This particular article on immigration rules is on such a vague but normal topic it really is just a good example that wikipedia is [a] WP:NOTDICTionary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longthicknosnip (talk • contribs) — Longthicknosnip (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

note, nominator has been blocked as sock of user:FireTool87--Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate, since a user entering this as a search term could be looking for quite a lot of different things. Immigration to the United Kingdom since 1922, preserving the contribution history under the redirect, would need to be one of them, and the equivalent articles for other major countries should also be listed.—S Marshall T/C 09:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Immigration as the title is too general and similar to that topic. Warden (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Immigration for now. There could be a case for an article specifically about immigration law, but currently we only have astub whose information is more than duplicated elsewhere. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On second thoughts, make that Immigration law, which is almost a synonym. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.