Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Interop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J-Interop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't convey how this software meets either our WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE notability guidelines. Other than the original research paper published by it's authors, the best other mentions I can find is passing references in a couple of other papers (see [1]) and a few blogs, stackoverflow questions and the like. To my mind this doesn't meet our notability threshold. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Also, pinging author Sae1962 for comment, along with the only other contributor Dialectric who previously flagged notability concerns. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant WP:RS coverage. Per nom, a search turns up some scattered sourcing but nothing substantial. Dialectric (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.