Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEMP Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KEMP Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable company (article created by recently blocked sock/meat farm, likely a PR company, that have been using WP for promotional purposes) EyeSerene^talk 14:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.

Delete. Another non-notable networking appliances company advertising on Wikipedia. They have a flagship product. They produce load balancing networking products and application delivery appliances for small, medium and enterprise businesses. "Small, medium, and .... enterprise"???? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 95% of the article is essentially their product catalog and sales points for their products. No evidence of wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 16:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete Spam. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found two mentions on Google and Yahoo, but aside from that I didn't see any other notable sources. SwisterTwister talk 19:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep - I find it odd that this article has been on the wiki for 2 years without comment, then, all of a sudden, there are four comments wanting to delete on the same day withing 4.5 hours of each other. Hmmmm. Maybe not coincidence. The content is very relevant to the companies business and to that of load-balancing and no more sales oriented than other company sites. And a quick check of the competition (F5, Radware, etc) shows much more sales and general blurb. Also, during the past 2 years KEMP has become much more successfull and a google search will show high click rates. Granted the information could be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cejayem (talk • contribs) 20:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.