Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional deer and moose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) treelo _radda 21:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional deer and moose

List of fictional deer and moose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Complete listcruft. I can't see any point at which a list of fictional deer would be useful to anyone other than the article creator. Ironholds (talk) 17:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep lists of fictional animals are surprisingly useful. Admittedly not this list, but I used others to find the name of a cartoon I couldn't find otherwise. It is also useful to see how the same animal is portrayed differently in different genres of fiction, especially the different degrees of anthropomorphism. Thryduulf (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The nominator hasn't really stated any policy-based reason for deletion. A list of fictional deer and moose seems like a well defined list that would meet all the requirements for a list. Also, other articles of this sort have been kept (or resulted in no consensus) in the past, and unless opinions have changed on this sort of article, I don't see any reason to delete this one (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional raccoons, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional monkeys, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional worms, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional cats, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fictional Pandas). Calathan (talk) 17:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Although the title is a bit awkward since moose are members of the deer family, along with elk. Steve Dufour (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep nominators rationale could be applied to any article and isn't a valid reason for deletion. Lugnuts (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Moose are members of the deer family, along with elk etc. - Ret.Prof (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Speedy Keep. --AuthorityTam (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but rename to just "List of fictional deer"; as pointed out above, this would also include moose and elk.—Chowbok ☠ 21:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball keep per above. The list contains a clearly defined criteria for inclusion, and per Calathan, there is a precend that "List of fictional x"s are appropriate and easily verifiable lists. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.