Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at the Wankhede Stadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of international cricket centuries at the Wankhede Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the individual entries are of course notable, the list topic as a whole seems to lack notability (WP:LISTN) and is mainly covered by statistical databases only. It isn't an exceptionally rare occurence anyway (41 test centuries in 23 tests): the centuries will individually be covered in match reports and the like, but the group of these centuries by ground is apparently not really of interest. Many similar pages have already been deleted at AfD, the latest was here which also lists earlier similar AfDs. Fram (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket, Lists, and India. Fram (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTMIRROR and for the same reasons as per List of international cricket centuries at Kingsmead Cricket Ground and several others which have resulted in deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 10:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTDATABASE. This is effectively a query into a database of cricket results; no non-statistical sources. Several similar articles have been deleted there is no argument by consistency to keep this either. Walt Yoder (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Also, rather than continuing this piecemeal, perhaps the next nomination should be Old Trafford, followed by the remaining 30 as a bulk nomination? Walt Yoder (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I think we've already established a precedent: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Dubai International Cricket Stadium. These were bulk nominations from a while back. Ajf773 (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, but no. I tried that with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium, which didn't go down too well. Fram (talk) 07:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NOTSTATS and more importantly WP:GNG. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, above and previous discussions. No encyclopedic value, just stats. Nigej (talk) 09:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.