Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricketers from Queensland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of international cricketers from Queensland

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has unclear list criteria (whether this is about state of birth or first state represented), seems to fail WP:NLIST, double-up of information already found on other pages, and probably fails WP:NOR. OliveYouBean (talk) 04:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all have essentially the same problems:

Per the apparent consensus at the cricket wikiproject, these are clear deletions for me. Blue Square Thing (talk) 04:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Cricket, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete These are just listcruft, the discussion on the cricket WikiProject has led to a consensus that these aren't needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - @Rugbyfan22: "cruft" is not a reason for deletion (it's an essay not a deletion policy), and the fact a WikiProject may have gained consensus does not mean that there is more widely. Can you please set out a proper reason for deletion? Deus et lex (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Personally not sue they pass WP:NLIST, and has been discussed by editors, I'm not sure there's a need for these when we list by state sides anyway, and there seems to be apparent confusion between the content of these lists also. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all all fail WP:NLIST. LibStar (talk) 11:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. I really can't see any need for these when we have lists of international players by country. There are bound to be contradictions because of the inherent from and for syndrome, causing confusion for the readers. BoJó | talk UTC 12:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all to repeat my comments from the discussion at WT:CRIC: "We have lists for cricketers that played for a state's cricket team e.g. List of Queensland first-class cricketers, and those articles seem to be a much worse version/almost duplicate of them. And agree that "cricketers from X" is ambiguous too. " Joseph2302 (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.