Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Mason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mimi Mason (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD (detagged without comment) ; non-notable model. GHits are minimal, and the assertion of notability via a management company founded by her doesn't seem to fly either. Fails WP:NMODEL. Also mostly unsourced BLP to boot. §FreeRangeFrog 02:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The company has a valid DBA issued through the Erie County Clerks office and was legitimately founded by Ms. Mason on July 14, 2011 I do not feel the page should be removed ^[1] In this image Mimi is the model wearing the shorter skirt ^[2] Article Image Mimi Mason ^[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgoodman15 (talk • contribs)

Information about the company is not relevant or notable to Mimi Mason herself. Although these images show her, it never actually mentions her therefore not useful. To learn more about editing, please visit Wikipedia:Introduction. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Although there are some photos, the links never actually mention her and the few links that mention her are irrelevant to her modelling career and refer to her as Shamiqua Mason, I'm assuming she used her full name prior to her career. Google News found nothing relevant and my own search provided a social network profile here which, of course, is useless. She certainly has potential and may be notable for the near future but there isn't anything suggesting notability at this time. Please note that I have trimmed the article from its current promotional state as shown here. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As indicated by SwisterTwister, the mentions of the subject in the sources provided and those I can find are trivial and not particularly substantive. She exists, but does not appear to meet WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.