Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mughal Army

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Stubbed. Copyrighted material has been removed Mark Arsten (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copyright material from www.indianetzone.com/37/military_organization.htm Baloo1000 (talk) 07:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 3. Snotbot  t • c »  08:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Cleanup The subject is important. Mughal Army has been subject of scholarly studies. But, copyvio is an important issue too which needs to be fixed! --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove all copyright material and stubbify - we cannot allow copyright material in the encyclopedia, and indeed, I am just about to remove most of the copyvio material, an action which can be taken by any editor. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Now copyvio material has been removed this is a perfectly encyclopaedic topic and should have an article. Frankly, the nominator should have done this. It would have taken less time than nominating for deletion! -- Necrothesp (talk) 19:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Books have been written exclusively about mughal army and warfare. I don't know why the editor who removed copyvio removed references too. --Anbu121 (talk me) 13:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.