Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Gosselin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (Note, Okmrman is INDEFFed and their !vote disregarded, so no relist needed IMO) Star Mississippi 18:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Gosselin

Nadine Gosselin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, and Canada. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This is a misreading of WP:NSKATE. Subjects can still be notable if they separately meet WP:GNG as is potentially the case here. ~Kvng (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Subject meets the WP:GNG with sources such as [[1]] and [[2]] (which is already in the article). Let'srun (talk) 12:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- The subject meets GNG, which the nominator ignores entirely, with sufficient coverage that goes beyond routine sports coverage. JTtheOG (talk) 01:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.