Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Qazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimous modulo socks. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naveed Qazi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author with no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and fails WP:AUTHOR. The creator appears to have a conflict of interest. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nominator, non notable, COI article trying to make self notable by having a Wikipedia article instead of the other way around. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence anywhere of notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Naveed Qazi is a popular writer in Kashmir. he is a profilic columnist. Almost all regional newspapers have published him. The newspapers are popular and authentic even the portals like free press Kashmir. Writers like Mirza Waheed, Fahad Shah, Siddhartha Gigoo, Z G Muhammad have praised his writing who have Wikipedia profiles too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Readeratbest (talk • contribs) 21:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Note that Readeratbest has no other edits. I strongly suspect this is a block-evading sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also Readeratbest has removed the comments above by Viewmont Viking (signed "VViking") and myself. Since attempting to disrupt this discussion by repeatedly removing the AfD notice from the article was one of the disruptive practices of the creator of the article, that adds to the impression of sockpuppetry. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep Please mind your language. I'm new to encylopedia and I’ll start editing soon. I m new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Readeratbest (talk • contribs) 21:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

You've already indicated you think the article should be kept. Do not attempt to stack the votes like that. --Yamla (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

‘’’ keep’’’ This writer is a popular individual because he has written two books and is a popular columnist in Kashmir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koshur ninja (talk • contribs) 13:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for already striking out your comment, block-evading sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.