Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Canley (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Jordan

Has not played in a fully pro League yet. Jimbo^[online] 09:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Does being a substitute count although I would like to see some game time.Capitalistroadster (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No, they must have actually played. Jimbo^[online] 09:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO#Athletes. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable per WP:BIO. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Nominated on the substitutes bench (and thus presumably being given a first-team squad number) for three matches in one of the world's top leagues, even if he didn't play, means he is considered notable in my view. Given he is a youth goalkeeper opportunities to play are slightly more limited than his outfield counterparts and a little bit of latitude should be given here. Qwghlm (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - was only an used sub nearly 18 months ago. Non-notable youth team player. No problem with re-creating if he actually crosses the white line, either at Portsmouth or another professional outfit. - fchd (talk) 10:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet WP:FOOTY notability criteria, when/if he plays for the 1st team the article can be recreated. King of the North East 11:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not yet notable. --Dweller (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO and his role as an unused sub doesn't mean he will definitely pass WP:BIO. Recreate if he does later in his career. Peanut4 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.