Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisation's goals (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Organisation's goals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a very general topic indeed, but which essentially just the uncritical recapitulation of the very general views of a notable writer on organization theory-- his works are hte only substantial references. I considered whether they might be merged into the article on Mintzberg, but I doubt they are in any sense his distinctive ideas. DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Is "unencyclopedic topic" a valid reason to delete? This just seems way, way too general. Mlb96 (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to strategic planning, or delete. Chris857 (talk) 18:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TNT and WP:CFORK. The title isn't appropriate (it should be organizational goals), the content seems to be unduly promoting Mr. Mintzberg, and I don't see Strategic planning as a great target. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Organisational ideology also needs a delete or redirect; I'm not finding another article on companies with specific ideological values though, so I can't justify calling it a CFORK. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see also, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisational ideology DGG ( talk ) 18:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.