Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Bhandari (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Bhandari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being an Indian Administrative Service officer is just a government job and doesn't automatically confer notability as per WP:SNG. Also, the individual clearly does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Charlie (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Charlie (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there is absolutely no assertion of any kind of significant notability in this article - as the nominator said, this is a normal government job. This is the third nomination of the same article so I'd suggest SALTing also. None of the sources are both independent and have significant coverage. Daniel (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Graduated third in his class, then got a functionary job, is his claim to notability? I can't find any sources from the last 12 years since the last AfD that make this individual more notable now. SALT is required. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This could be about the person [1] but I don't think it helps notability; the name is too common to be able to find much. Oaktree b (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.